Who Benefits? The Real Impact of ESG Investing

ESG front cover

“ESG investment practices favour stakeholder capitalism over shareholder capitalism, which erodes companies’ conventional corporate governance structures. It turns companies into political actors.”

In this paper, Sinclair Davidson and Scott Hargreaves evaluate the rise of ESG investing, its effectiveness, and the problems it poses to the Western financial world.

 

Summary of Research Paper

The financial sector has made a clarion call for investments in environmental and social sustainability. Businesses have therefore moved away from purely profit-driven motives towards generating wealth alongside producing social benefits.

However, ESG investing is beginning to fall out of favour, not least due to the internal incoherence at the heart of its approach. Concerns are growing that ESG funds do not support the sustainable causes they purport to promote, increase the potential for conflicts of interest, and yield lower financial returns for higher management fees.

These concerns give rise to several questions: Are businesses trading the pursuit of profit for the promotion of political causes? What is the role of corporations in the modern economy? Should stakeholder capitalism or shareholder investment have priority? And does ESG actually achieve its stated aims?

The top six global asset managers hold a combined total of just over $29 trillion—one-quarter of all assets under management. Given this incredibly concentration of wealth, the rise of ESG means that a tiny number of people hold significant sway over what is seen as “ethical” investing.

Furthermore, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests ESG does not fulfil its promises and, in several respects, could actively undermine its stated goals. Areas of concern include:

  • Lack of standardisation

  • Incomplete due diligence

  • Masking unethical practices

  • Poor financial performance

  • Possible conflicts of interest

  • Concentration of economic power

  • Transfer of democratic accountability

Ethical investing is a personal choice. But investors must be able to make informed decisions. Strengthened scrutiny, transparency, methodology, and accountability will help create a system that finds an appropriate balance between shareholders’ and stakeholders’ interests and empowers companies to contribute to social benefits through the pursuit of profit.

Sinclair Davidson and Scott Hargreaves

Sinclair Davidson is Professor of Institutional Economics at the Blockchain Innovation Hub at RMIT University, and an Adjunct Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs. He is also a Fellow of the British Blockchain Association, and a Research Associate at the University College London Centre for Blockchain Technologies.

Scott Hargreaves has led the Institute of Public Affairs as Executive Director since 2022, having joined the organisation as a Senior Fellow in 2015 after a successful career as an adviser to Governments on major reform projects, and in the private sector in various corporate and consulting roles with specialities in energy, corporate affairs, and sustainability.

Previous
Previous

The Foundations of Human Dignity: A Framework for Rights

Next
Next

Playing Alone? Why the Best Gift You Could Give Your Child is a Brother or Sister